Horizon Europe is not a lemon, so stop squeezing it

16.10.2023

Nine years ago, the League of European Research Universities (LERU) used the lemon comparison to remind the European institutions that the (then) Horizon 2020 budget was not a lemon which could be squeezed according to the flavour of the day. Unfortunately, the situation has not improved since, on the contrary. The budget of the current Framework Programme for Research & innovation, Horizon Europe, is almost constantly being squeezed to co-fund new EU priorities and policy initiatives. And on top of that, the EU Ministers of Economic and Financial Affairs (ECOFIN Council) always wants to cut the annual budget for Horizon Europe, now again for its 2024 budget. Luckily there is one EU institution, the European Parliament (EP), that defends the Horizon Europe budget and tries to protect it from constant plundering.

LERU strongly supports the EP’s commitment to increase the Horizon Europe 2024 budget, as proposed by the European Commission (EC), instead of cutting it as it is the intention of the ECOFIN Council. LERU also applauds the EP’s proposal to seek additional Member State funding for STEP, the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform, avoiding in this way the move of €800 million from Horizon Europe’s pillar II to the EIC Accelerator in pillar III, which would be used for STEP investments.

Horizon Europe is an ambitious R&I programme, with many different sub-programmes which have their own merit, are very popular with researchers and innovators, and have, in most cases, very low success rates. This proves there’s no spare money in Horizon Europe and no room for further budget cuts. Also, decommitments, funding which is not used in the year it was budgeted for, should stay within the programme to fund more high-quality proposals and increase success rates.

The Member States know all of this because they have put considerable time and effort in negotiating Horizon Europe in detail, and are involved in developing the work programmes for the different Horizon Europe funding streams. However, their constant pressure to reduce the EU (R&I) budget gets the upper hand. LERU therefor urges Member States to respect the engagements they have committed to through the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF). Constantly pushing for the reduction of the EU (R&I) budget goes against these commitments. And, if the EU (i.e. the Member States) wants to address new priorities, then new funding needs to follow.

Prof. Kurt Deketelaere, Secretary-General of LERU, states:

“We are hopeful that the EP’s common sense and proposals to protect and strengthen the Horizon Europe budget will prevail. We also call upon the EC to continue to protect Horizon Europe and its successor in the review of the current MFF and the proposal for the next one. Also, the EC should stop itself with proposing to move around Horizon Europe funding, in order to please the ECOFIN Council and the EP. There is simply not enough money in Horizon Europe, so what is there should stay there. Both the ECOFIN Council and the EC should be braver and acknowledge that if certain priorities need to be addressed at EU level, funding should follow. New priorities require new funding. Reason why LERU will continue to push for the ring-fencing of the FP budget, now and in the future. Horizon Europe is not a lemon, so stop squeezing it!”

Contact

Prof. Kurt Deketelaere, LERU Secretary-General, or +32 499 80 89 99

Laura Keustermans, LERU Senior Policy Officer Research & Education, or +32 476 97 73 04

Media contact:
Bart Valkenaers, LERU Senior Policy Officer Strategic Communication & Public Affairs, or +32 498 08 43 49